Imagine you have to take a big state science test. It’s full of questions about life science, earth science, physics and chemistry.
But wait — you haven’t taken all those courses in high school yet.
That’s what some high school students and younger kids, in Kern County and across the state, may face when they take the new online California Science Test for the first time this spring. It comes after the state passed new Next Generation Science Standards in 2013.
West High science teacher and department chairwoman Carrie Newman said one of the biggest challenges with the new assessment is it tests students in all the sciences. The Kern High School District requirement is only two years of science, so many students don’t go on to take physics or chemistry.
“It’s a little troublesome because they’re taking a test on subjects most of them haven’t taken classes in,” Newman said. “It’s unfair to expect them to know everything.”
Click here to read the full story in The Record (Bakersfield, CA, April 4, 2019)
Local students aren’t learning science by the book anymore.
Instead of memorizing facts or filling out worksheets, Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District (SMMUSD) students are building their own solar water heaters or extracting DNA from strawberries. The projects serve as a jumping-off point for collecting and analyzing data, making graphs and writing about concepts. After making solar water heaters, students at Will Rogers Elementary School collected temperature data to understand which materials in the heaters made the water heat up the most and wrote scripts of commercials to sell their heaters.
“We’re looking at practices scientists really use every day, like asking questions, using tools and analyzing data,” said Dr. Irene Gonzalez-Castillo, director of curriculum and instruction.
SMMUSD has been working to incorporate the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) since 2016 and set a three-year plan in motion last fall.
Click here to read the full story in the Santa Monica Daily Press (April 15, 2019)
Eighth-grader Liam Bayne has always liked math and science — that’s one reason his family sent him to The Alternative School For Math and Science (ASMS). But he was surprised and excited when his sixth-grade science class started each new topic with experimentation, not lecture or textbook learning.
“I was really excited because the first thing we did was experiments and hands-on stuff, which is my favorite part,” Liam said. At ASMS the teaching philosophy centers around giving students experiences that pique their interest to know more. Their science curriculum is based on a program called Full Option Science System (FOSS), but has changed over time as teachers bring new ideas to the curriculum and focus on meeting the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS).
Click here to read the full story featured on KQEW Radio (April 14, 2019)
Nearly every person who grabbed the microphone at a state education hearing Tuesday night offered a different reason why they believed the proposed standards for teaching Utah students about science were faulty, inaccurate or skewed.
The public meeting Tuesday was the final of six for Utah parents and teachers to comment on the science standards after the state Board of Education voted to release them in early January for feedback. For more than 90 minutes, the attendees waved peer-reviewed journals and flashed credentials to argue their opposition.
The new standards, though, were based on guidelines set by the Next Generation of Science Standards developed by a consortium of national experts. And science educators throughout the state were largely behind the push for the updates, appealing to school board members for months to say that their classroom learning goals were outdated and some were based on since-disproven material.
The teaching guidelines, if approved by the board, would apply to Utah students in kindergarten through fifth grade, with the last changes made in 2010, and in high school, with the last revisions made in 2002. Middle school guidelines for the state were approved in 2015, setting the stage for much of the current debate.
Click here to read the full story in the Salt Lake Tribune (March 27, 2019)
Officials want to delay the roll out of a high school graduation requirement tied to a demanding new science test could be delayed for at least two more years, following a preliminary vote of the Maryland State School Board on Tuesday.
The board voted to change a regulation that would have made passing the Next Generation Science Assessment a requirement to obtain a diploma beginning in 2020.
The new test, which replaces a decade-old biology test, was “field tested” last school year. The test was supposed to count as a graduation requirement for students who begin taking the test in January 2020. But Maryland Department of Education staff recommended continuing to have students take the test but delay making passing it a requirement for two years.
The new standards encompass physical sciences, life sciences, earth and space sciences and engineering.
There’s growing concern on the part of educators and legislators that the latest version of tests that high schoolers will be expected to pass are more difficult than the old Maryland State Assessments given in four subjects — algebra 1, English 10, government and biology — beginning in 2008.
Click here to read the full story in The Baltimore Sun (March 27, 2019)
Norwalk (Connecticut) High School teacher Samantha DeMatteo is on a quest to make chemistry less scary, teaching hands-on lessons with real-world applications.
She’s teaching her students about stains and how to most effectively remove them using different cleaning products. DeMatteo distributed T-shirts stained with chocolate, hot sauce and tea and asked students to determine why some cleaning products were more effective than others. It’s a more modern way of studying molecular shape and chemical bonding and helps students “learn with a purpose instead of learning it for the sake of learning it,” she said.
The 25-year-old Penn State graduate is one of six teachers chosen nationwide to participate in creating Next Generation Science Standards lessons with other educators at the University of Colorado Boulder in July.
Succeeding in the competitive selection process means, for one week, DeMatteo will work with Inquiry Hub, a research team of educators from Northwestern, University of Colorado Boulder and Denver Public Schools to develop chemistry units eventually used by teachers across the country.
Click here to read the full story featured in The Hour (March 13, 2019)
The first independent review to weigh whether new science curriculum series are truly aligned to a set of national standards was issued this morning—and mostly, the materials fell well short of expectations.
Four of the series—Discovery’s Science Techbook, Carolina Biological Supply Company’s Science and Technology Concepts, and two versions of Teachers’ Curriculum Institute’s Bring Science Alive!—were deemed insufficiently aligned to the Next Generation Science Standards. One series, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt’s Science Dimensions, was considered partially aligned. Only one series, Amplify’s Amplify Science, got top marks for alignment, coherence, and usability, according to the nonprofit and curriculum group EdReports, which conducted the reviews.
Click here to read the full article by Ed Week‘s Stephen Sawchuck as he answers the follow questions:
- Who are these folks, and how did they conduct these reviews?
- What’s in these standards?
- Where did EdReports think these materials fell short?
- What do the publishers say about these findings?
- Where do these findings fit in with other science reviews?
And, stay tuned for more as he explores what the science education field thinks of these results. Readers can leave a comment, or email him directly at email@example.com.
An emerging science concept called phenomena-based learning—backed by the NGSS—taps into students’ natural desire to make sense of their world.
This approach encourages students to observe natural phenomena, such as a rising tide or a glass shattered by sound. They can then investigate why it occurs.
Students also learn that the approach mirrors how actual scientists find answers through reasoning and inquiry.
“I like to think of phenomena as breadcrumbs that teachers are going to use to guide students along learning paths,” says Ted Willard, assistant director for science standards for the National Science Teachers Association.
Unlike in a traditional teacher-led lesson, students in NGSS phenomena-based learning lead by asking questions.
They also collaborate, discover connections, design models, and ultimately, make sense of what they observe.
“This inquiry-based approach avoids ‘intellectual bulimia’ in which students just learn words to spit back out on a test,” says Willard.
“By teaching them the reasoning process, they get a deeper understanding of science concepts.”
Click here to read the full story in District Administration magazine (February 14, 2019)
A nonprofit working on open-source curriculum that aligns with state standards is the latest development in the Carnegie Corporation of New York’s 10-year effort to improve science education in the United States. OpenSciEd, the new nonprofit, and the decade-long journey that led to its founding lend insight into how one of the oldest foundations in the country sees its role and future within an increasingly crowded education philanthropy landscape.
The nonprofit has been tasked with creating curriculum to align with the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS), which Carnegie was instrumental in developing. So far, Carnegie has put $4 million into the organization through the National Center for Civic Innovation at the Fund for the City of New York.
“The quality of the curriculum a teacher is working with makes a difference,” said Jim Short, program director of Carnegie’s Leadership and Teaching to Advance Learning portfolio.
“We know that the quality of teacher matters. We know that having a good principal, instructional leader in the school to support the teacher matters,” said Short. “But I think there’s enough data now showing that the quality of the instructional materials—the curriculum the teacher is working with—is the third thing that equally matters.”
Developing a framework for science education and overhauling outdated state standards to reflect the framework were the first steps to improving how science was taught in classrooms. The result was the Next Generation Science Standards, released back in 2013. Now, about two-thirds of students attend school in states that have adopted the NGSS or standards that closely resemble them.
Click here to read the full story by Inside Philanthropy. (February 20, 2019)