Louisiana’s top school board has endorsed a review of science standards in its public schools. The benchmarks used today were crafted in 1997, and they are the third oldest in the nation.
The panel is scheduled to make its final recommendations in February and the state Board of Elementary and Secondary Education will review the proposed changes in March.
Click here to read the full article in The Advocate (June 21, 2016)
The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) was the focus of a June 21 segment on the popular news program, PBS Newshour, which included insights from NSTA’s Executive Director David Evans. The program looked at how the NGSS is redefining instruction in science classrooms across the country.
Reporter John Tulenko visited Campbell County in Wyoming. The county is leading the way with standards, which the state has yet to adopt officially. Seventeen other states <plus Washington, D.C.> are already on board, accounting for an estimated 35 percent of public school students nationwide.
“I think that the most important reason for developing new standards is that we have actually learned a lot about the way children learn. And children learn science best by actually doing it,” said David Evans.
So far, there’s been little pushback that has been seen with the Common Core.
David Evans noted that “the federal government and the Department of Education really hasn’t had anything to do with the next generation science standards. It’s really just that simple. There have not been strong incentives and there hasn’t been any arm-twisting.”
Click here to view the entire program on PBSNewsHour (June 21, 2016)
No heated debates or controversies about climate change have overshadowed the development of Wyoming’s K-12 science standards this year, which appear months away from adoption.
The language on climate change is not vastly different from the Next Generation Science Standards that caused a political storm two years ago. But the process for developing the standards has been more transparent, officials say.
Multiple public comment periods were offered, and the people who developed the standards represent a cross-section of Wyoming, from educators to industry representatives.
The proposed standards are in their final public comment period, which ends Aug. 12. Gov. Matt Mead and the State Board of Education will review comments before making a final decision to adopt or amend the standards this fall.
Click here to read the full article in the Casper Star Tribune ( June 19, 2016)
WEST CALDWELL, NJ – Introducing new standards for the upcoming Caldwell-West Caldwell school year, science teachers in the middle and high school levels gave a presentation to the Caldwell-West Caldwell Board of Education (CWC BOE) at its public meeting on June 6.
The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) will be implemented in grades 6-12 next year, and K-5 the following year, according to Scott Klepesch, Director of Instructional Services for the district.
“It has been fifteen years since there was a national look at science standards,” said Klepesch. “These standards are designed to create grade uniformity across the country, and prepare students to be college and career ready, similar to the language of Common Core.”
Click here to read the full article in TAP into West Essex (June 8, 2016)
For all the controversy involving the West Virginia Board of Education and the Legislature over the state’s adoption of Next Generation Science Standards, which will take effect statewide next school year, the National Science Teachers Association doesn’t recognize that West Virginia actually adopted them.
NSTA Executive Director David Evans said not labeling West Virginia a Next Generation-adopting state “doesn’t mean that we’re really finding fault with the new West Virgina standards.” He called the state’s new science standards a “terrific improvement” over its current standards, which aren’t based on Next Generation. – See more at:
Click here to read the full story in the West Virignia Gazette (May 29, 2016)
The Wyoming State Board of Education gave the green light to promulgate new draft science standards aimed at ensuring students are well-prepared while keeping politics out of science classrooms.
The standards review committee worked through different sets of standards, including those previously existing in Wyoming and in other states, line by line to come up with an update to Wyoming’s science standards, which the Wyoming Department of Education says have not seen a significant revision since the early 2000s.
The committee settled on the Next Generation Science Standards as a framework for drafting new Wyoming standards, but altered some of the wording. For example, one NGSS standard reads:
“Ask questions to clarify evidence of the factors that have caused the rise in global temperatures over the past century.”
For the new Wyoming draft standards, the committee used different language (MS-ESS3-5).
“Ask questions to clarify evidence of the factors that have caused changes in global temperatures over time.”
Governor Mead has a 10-day review where he can instruct the agency to proceed with the adoption process, or delay public comment and set meetings with those he feels necessary to garner more information.
After receiving the permission of the Governor to continue with the rule promulgation process, a 45-day public comment period will open. The State Board of Education will then review and prepare statements for the comments of the public. The Governor then has the opportunity to sign the new standards into law after a 75-day review period by his office.
Local school boards, teachers, and district and building administrators control implementation of the state standards, including curriculum choices and instructional methods.
Click here to read the full story from KOWB Radio (May 20, 2016)
Oregon has new science standards and plans to roll out a new science test in 2018.
The Next Generation Science Standards were developed by 26 states, and 18 have signed on to use them. They were adopted in Oregon in 2014 and are being phased in now. Just as important as content are methods of scientific inquiry and cross-cutting concepts such as cause and effect or stability and change. The standards also emphasize hands-on learning.
According to Derek Brown, director of assessment at the Oregon Department of Education, “Because there is the expectation of higher-level thinking skills and the opportunity for students to demonstrate what they know, we would expect that the test would be more than a straight multiple-choice test, which is what we have now.”
Click here to read the full story in The Bulletin (May 8, 2016)
An update of science standards for Nebraska public schools is underway, and the Nebraska Department of Education is looking to the Next Generation Science Standards as a guide. Those standards weren’t around in 2010 when Nebraska last updated its own.
The state department worked with a consultant, the Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning, to compare Nebraska standards with the Next Generation ones. While the majority of the content was similar in both sets of standards, the depth of knowledge in the Next Generation standards, particularly in middle and high school levels, was at “a much higher level,” said Cory Epler, senior administrator for teaching and learning in the Nebraska Department of Education.
The Nebraska State Board of Education will convene Nebraska teachers, professors and other science professionals to update the state’s standards.
Click here to read the full story on Omaha.com (May 6, 2016)
On April 20, the Kansas Associated Press reported that a federal appeals court rejected a nonprofit group’s claim that science standards for Kansas public schools promote atheism.
“The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver affirmed on Tuesday a lower court ruling that had dismissed the lawsuit brought by a nonprofit group calling itself Citizens for Objective Public Education.
At issue in the lawsuit are guidelines adopted in 2013 by the Kansas Board of Education that treat evolution and climate change as key scientific concepts.
The appeals court agreed with U.S. District Judge Daniel Crabtree that opponents of the standards had no standing to sue because they could not show an injury.
Its decision notes the standards themselves recommend objective curricula and allows districts the option not to adopt the standards or to teach alternative origins theories.”
Indian Prairie School District 204 in Naperville, Il, is changing the way middle school students learn science.
After a month of debate, the school board Monday approved a new middle school curriculum and accompanying materials aimed at fulfilling the Next Generation Science Standards. Instead of regurgitating information from a teacher’s lecture or textbook, students will be given an inquiry concept to explore through activities.
Click here to read the full story in the Chicago Tribune (April 5, 2016)